Search AI, LLM, agent, multimodal, and AI-for-science benchmarks
Today's radar
Benchmarks with this name
Daily briefing
Questions for today
Leaderboard
Latest releases · 30 days
i
Ranking attention-ranking-v1: 55% GitHub stars, 30% Hugging Face paper upvotes, 15% Hugging Face dataset downloads, last 30 days, each normalized as log1p(value) / log1p(window maximum) and summed to a 0 to 100 score. A release is ranked only when enough of its weight comes from fresh, durable signals; the rest are listed with limited signals. Dataset downloads are a rolling 30-day figure, never a cumulative total. Stars come from the benchmark's own repository, never a parent framework. Window Sep 16, 2026 to Oct 16, 2026, UTC.
Recently released benchmarks, ranked by the attention they are receiving now: GitHub stars, Hugging Face paper upvotes and Hugging Face dataset downloads over the last 30 days.
01openclaw 2026.8.34released Oct 2, 202655low
This is a gateway-only extended-stable release, which is our current equivalent to LTS. This release is OpenClaw from the end of August 2026, plus critical security updates, reliability and performance fixes, and features like new model support. The latest version of OpenClaw at the time of this release is 2026.9.7 2026.8.34 Highlights Extended-stable correctness rollup: backport 113 audit-selected fix units across upgrades, Doctor, authentication, sessions, channels, plugins, sandboxing, filesystem safety, model runtimes, and release packaging. Complete rescan: re-evaluate the full 2026.8.33 discovery range, large mixed-purpose pull requests, and the 2026.7.35 lineage instead of advancing only from the previous backport cursor. Upgrade and recovery hardening: preserve credentials, agent state, plugin inventory, transcripts, schedules, service ownership, and runtime links through upgrades, restarts, and Doctor repair. Boundary fixes: tighten remote filesystem mutation, plugin and skill scanning, browser authentication, channel reply identity, private skill ingress, and scoped runtime ownership. Changes Extended-stable release preparation: align OpenClaw, publishable plugins, native version metadata, generated channel catalogs, and npm package inventories to 2026.8.34. Fixes Plugins: Recover orphan installs without weakening ownership. Doctor: Repair keyed multi-agent rosters without ownership (#134706) Prevent device pairing migration crash on contaminated records. Doctor: Preserve per-agent memory search during upgrades. Doctor: Detect shared auth migration by provenance (#134808) Cron: Refuse stale doctor store rewrites. Gateway: Refresh model catalog after auth changes (#134361) Openai: Repair stale doctor route pins.
- GitHub stars
- 392,150normalized 1.00source ↗weight 55%
- Hugging Face paper upvotes
- not observednormalized not scoredweight 30%
- Hugging Face dataset downloads, last 30 days
- not observednormalized not scoredweight 15%
02VideoJev: System One Model for Video Understanding and Interactionreleased Oct 13, 202651high
Visual agents must turn video observations into timely decisions to track progress and choose what to do next. Building on the emerging System One paradigm, we introduce VideoJev, a family of models that cast video understanding and interaction as structured decision tasks. We adapt pretrained multimodal large language models (MLLMs) by replacing autoregressive answer decoding with a shared head that scores temporal intervals and textual options against video evidence. These scores yield event spans or answer choices, unifying temporal grounding and multiple-choice video question answering. This combines the semantic flexibility of MLLMs with efficient decisions that agents can use directly. As an interaction unfolds, new goals and intermediate results prompt further queries about the same visual history. VideoJev therefore reuses visual computation through Cached inference for queries as they arrive and Joint inference for multiple queries in a single forward pass. Across three temporal grounding benchmarks, VideoJev-4B and VideoJev-35B-A3B improve mean mIoU over their backbones by 6.7 and 10.8 points, respectively, with measured inference speedups of $2.8$-$3.1\times$. On four video QA benchmarks, both achieve performance comparable to their backbones in Thinking mode, with measured inference speedups exceeding $100\times$. These results offer a unified, reusable decision interface for composing structured visual judgments into complex, open-ended workflows.
03OmniCompass: A Holistic Benchmark for Omni-Modal Video Grounding and Understandingreleased Oct 13, 202647high
With the rapid development of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), evaluating their video understanding capabilities has become increasingly important. Existing video understanding benchmarks cover only part of the evaluation dimensions, limiting systematic diagnosis of omni-modal video understanding. We introduce OmniCompass, a holistic benchmark for omni-modal video grounding and understanding. OmniCompass defines two evaluation tracks: OmniCompass-VL assesses vision-language models on tasks requiring visual evidence, while OmniCompass-AV assesses omni-modal models on tasks requiring joint audio-visual evidence. Each track includes three complementary tasks: temporal grounding (TG), spatial grounding (SG), and question answering (QA), assessing when a referenced target appears, where it is, and what happens. QA covers five perception and three reasoning categories in OmniCompass-VL, and three perception and two reasoning categories in OmniCompass-AV. OmniCompass-VL contains 820 videos and 2,460 instances across domains and three duration types: short, medium, and long. A narrative- and audio-rich subset forms OmniCompass-AV with 240 videos and 720 instances. Each instance is evaluated under two paired settings: text-only and text+image, specifying the same target through text and visual-language guidance. All instances are manually annotated with multi-round quality verification. Evaluations of 50 MLLMs show that open-source models still lag behind proprietary counterparts, particularly in audio-visual understanding. Precise temporal and spatial grounding remains challenging even for leading models, and their predictions still exhibit inconsistencies across the paired target specifications.
04Agent-Reflex: Teaching Language Agents to Act Reflectivelyreleased Oct 13, 202645high
Large language models have evolved from single-turn chatbots into interactive agents capable of long-horizon reasoning. In real deployments, MCP tool services can return noisy feedback and users may intervene to correct the agent, but existing methods provide limited supervision for reflection learning and failure recovery. To bridge this gap, we propose Agent-Reflex, a general training framework for incentivizing proactive reflection in agents. Specifically, Agent-Reflex comprises three stages. First, Environment Reflection Skill Discovery (RSD) injects grounded tool-feedback perturbations into environment scaling, samples a capability-diverse LLM pool, mines matched success-failure pairs, and summarizes reusable reflection meta-skills. Building on this skill library, we then apply Reflective Supervised Fine-Tuning (ReSFT) that converts each skill into supervision for self-reflection, skill recovery, and user-centric correction, strengthening complementary reflective behaviors. Finally, we propose On-Policy Reflective Policy Optimization (ORPO) to combine agentic reinforcement learning under noisy interactions with reflection-guided on-policy distillation to further elicit proactive reflection. Built on Qwen3-8B, Agent-Reflex reaches 58.6 overall on five long-horizon tool-use benchmarks and 29.1 on AgentNoiseBench, surpassing strong environment-scaling and reflection baselines. Experiments on six challenging agent benchmark suites demonstrate the effectiveness of Agent-Reflex. Further analyses show that Agent-Reflex improves agents'robustness to noise while maintaining stable training dynamics, supporting scalable agent training. Our code is available at https://github.com/RUC-NLPIR/Agent-Reflex.
05UltraText Bench: A Comprehensive Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Text Rendering in Image Generationreleased Oct 8, 202645high
Dense visual text requires image generators to reproduce long strings across multiple regions with correct placement and legibility. As short-string rendering improves, evaluation must test sustained performance across more demanding scenes. We introduce UltraText Bench, a bilingual benchmark for prompt-only generation of dense visual text. It contains 432 prompts spanning 24 real-world scene categories and three difficulty levels, split equally between English and Chinese. Each human-reviewed prompt supplies exact strings for four to twelve text regions, paired with structured references for their content, placement, and visual attributes. We use the Q-Judger vision-language model to assess each image against the complete reference, reporting text fidelity, text clarity, spatial quality, and scene quality. Across 24 model configurations, these dimensions reveal different strengths: Z-Image-Turbo gains 3.81 clarity points over Z-Image-Base while losing 14.76 fidelity points under the reported settings. Performance also varies with workload; Qwen-Image-2512's English composite falls from 86.50 at L1 to 42.86 at L3. Ten participants took part in human evaluation of the automatic scores. Repository: https://github.com/LINs-lab/UltraText_Bench.
06AgentSWE: Can Coding Agents Build the Agent You Actually Want?released Oct 12, 202645high
As the production of software passes into the hands of software itself, coding agents are increasingly commissioned to build agents fitted to their users' own workflows. This delegation carries a quiet assumption, that the delivered agent will faithfully serve the requirement it was built for, rather than merely appear to. No existing benchmark tests that assumption. We introduce AgentSWE, a benchmark for agent software engineering spanning three stages of the agent development lifecycle: Creation of a complete agent from a natural-language requirement, Editing of production agent codebases, and Optimization toward a measurable target. Each of its 25 tasks is framed as a commission rather than an exam: the builder iterates against a handful of illustrative cases, while acceptance exercises the frozen submission on held-out cases designed to span the full requirement, grading behavior against requirement-derived rubrics under hard pass/fail gates or, for Optimization, against the source benchmark's own objective. Evaluating a range of coding agents across models and harnesses, we find that none comes close to delivering what a requirement asks for: the gap between what a builder demonstrates and what it delivers is the norm, not the corner case. An accompanying empirical analysis of the failure trajectories identifies recurring failure modes, among them overfitting to the visible cases, hollow runtimes behind code that looks complete, and unsupported claims of completion, each a signal by which coding agents can learn to build the agents they are asked for.
07Intern-Decision: Efficient Multimodal Decision Making with Autoregressive Masked Language Modelingreleased Oct 16, 202645high
Interactive agents repeatedly choose among a finite set of actions, labels, or ordinal outcomes. Generating a free-form response for each choice adds latency and complicates the interface between a model and its environment. We present Intern-Decision, a family of 0.8B, 2B, and 4B multimodal decision models that return structured choices and candidate probabilities from text and optional images. Our autoregressive masked language modeling objective places one decision placeholder per field in a complete assistant JSON skeleton. Ground-truth symbols appear only in supervision, while all fields are evaluated in a single causal forward pass using the backbone's native language-model head. The 4B model achieves a 90.02% unweighted average accuracy across seven evaluation suites, compared with 88.74% for Jev v1.13.0. For a fixed 289-token request with three fields on one RTX 4090, mean latency is 44.16 ms for the 4B model and approximately 33--34 ms for the smaller models. On a separate 96-case known-distribution pilot, temperature scaling reduces expected multiclass Brier from 0.628 to 0.550 and expected calibration error from 0.213 to 0.089. A confidence-based handoff study on 111 public Jevbench-Hard items improves accuracy from 82/111 (73.87%) to 97/111 (87.39%) by routing 42 items to Atria-Dawn-Preview. We also describe qualitative game, visual interface, and browser demonstrations. These results support compact decision models as a practical component of larger agent systems.
08From Traces to Agentic Worlds: Agentic Language World Models for Interactive Environment Simulationreleased Oct 5, 202645high
Realistic environment replicas are increasingly valuable for training and evaluating LLM agents, yet the original systems may be inaccessible or impractical to reproduce. We explore agentic language world modeling: rather than rebuilding an executable environment, a world model agent serves as the environment for a task agent and supports faithful and stateful simulation. We instantiate this paradigm with Trace2Env, a learning-free framework for settings where the original system is unavailable but historical interaction traces remain accessible. Trace2Env reconstructs these traces into a reusable environment worldbook containing environment schemas, grounded evidence, and induced behavioral knowledge. At runtime, the world model agent actively consults the worldbook together with persistent episodic state to infer each action's observation and lasting state effects. Across nine environments, Trace2Env improves both next-observation fidelity and long-horizon interaction consistency over conventional prompt-based LWMs. In multi-turn interaction, task agent actions generated against Trace2Env remain valid more often when replayed in the real environment, indicating that its simulated dynamics better preserve the consequences of earlier actions across successive turns. These results establish agentic language world modeling as an alternative direction for building realistic environment replicas without reconstructing the original executable system.
09REMORY: Learning Residual Memory for Context Compactionreleased Oct 10, 202645high
Long-horizon agents compact their history to continue within a finite context window, but a textual summary alone may not support every subsequent decision. We introduce REMORY, a neural memory network that supplements the summary with a bounded sequence of soft memory tokens. Given the history and summary, the network learns to generate tokens that help a frozen LLM approximate the continuation it would produce with the full history. The tokens are conditioned on the summary and appended after it, forming an analogue of a residual connection along the sequence dimension. On SummHay, REMORY improves source attribution at nearly unchanged insight coverage and approaches the full-context joint score using only 5.2% of the input positions. Across long-horizon agent benchmarks, Qwen3.8-27B and GLM-5.3-Flash show consistent gains with residual memory. Both models also exhibit substantially fewer repeated tool outputs and tool errors on BrowseComp and Terminal-Bench 2.1.
10UniWAM: Unified World-Action Modelreleased Oct 1, 202644high
Vision-language-action models benefit from the understanding and reasoning capabilities of pretrained vision-language models, but action-only supervision provides limited grounding in world dynamics. Conversely, world-action models inherit spatiotemporal priors from video generation models, yet remain limited in semantic understanding and reasoning under distribution shifts. We introduce UniWAM, a unified architecture that integrates a physical reasoner, a world generator, and an action predictor to jointly learn semantic understanding of the physical world, visual generation, and action prediction. To ensure the quality of the training data, we developed a rigorous data cleaning and annotation pipeline for both human egocentric data and robot data. To adapt the vision-language component to embodied tasks while preserving its inherited language capabilities, we represent low-level actions in natural language and introduce a pre-training recipe that assigns complementary supervision from visual question answering (VQA) data, human egocentric data, and robot demonstrations to the appropriate model components. During post-training, future visual noise augmentation reduces reliance on precise future predictions, while history-conditioned flow matching uses encoded action history to initialize action generation. Together, these designs significantly reduce denoising steps while maintaining performance. UniWAM achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance across multiple evaluations, including in-distribution performance, robustness, generalization, instruction following, and long-horizon task execution. Furthermore, we uncover a log-linear scaling law of unified human-robot co-training, demonstrating the effectiveness of large-scale pre-training on a mixture of human and robot data.
408 of 1,152 releases in this window are ranked; the rest are listed with limited signals. Data through Oct 16, 2026 · average signal coverage 32%.
Benchmark Frontier
Which difficult benchmarks have been tested most
Each mark is one benchmark record. Height counts distinct models with numeric scores. Source model IDs preserve evaluated configurations; repeated score rows add no models. Source documents counts distinct cited reports or registry pages through the same evidence collection. Both counts appear on hover.
The side view projects reported scores and the selected counts onto the left wall, leaving out time. The gold staircase compares only benchmarks with verified score scales. Within the dated 2024+ cohort, a benchmark is Pareto when no other eligible benchmark has an equal or lower normalized score and an equal or greater selected count, with at least one strict advantage. Dates select the cohort; they do not determine dominance. Scores and counts are never multiplied. The score slice cannot promote a dominated benchmark onto the frontier.
Height uses log1p(count); ticks, tooltips and Pareto use raw counts. The axis covers the full scored 2024+ cohort and stays fixed while filtering. Only declared percentage metrics with a known selected count enter Pareto; lower-is-better percentages become 100 minus the original value. Hollow points flag an unverified score scale or an unknown count, which is never treated as zero. Overlapping caps are spaced apart; hover or focus traces their exact coordinates. Arrow keys move through benchmarks. A shared scale does not establish equivalent test protocols or prove a benchmark is solved.
The timeline starts on January 1, 2024, inclusive. Dates use the benchmark's release first, then its earliest numeric LLM score report. When a source dates score entries by model release, the earliest entry supplies a clearly labelled model-release proxy; this is not a verified score-publication date. Crawl timestamps and adoption-only mentions never supply dates. Known dates before 2024 are excluded. Records with no date remain individually visible in a labelled area.
- 01577 data points
- 02577 data points
- 03510 data points
- 04492 data points
- 05489 data points
No scored benchmarks match these filters.
Most documented benchmarks
Counts distinct source documents that record each benchmark. Model reports and registry pages use the same rule. Each document counts once per benchmark record. This measures documentation coverage, not benchmark quality.
- 01GPQA Diamond29 source documents
- 02Humanity's Last Exam22 source documents
- 03Terminal-Bench21 source documents
- 04SWE-bench Verified19 source documents
- 05AIME18 source documents
i
Counts distinct source documents that record each benchmark. Model reports and registry pages use the same rule. Each document counts once per benchmark record. This measures documentation coverage, not benchmark quality. Open the source-document list below to trace each count to its citations.
What the evidence shows Stated findings
Benchmarks by source documents
Each source document counts once per benchmark record. Repeated scores or mentions in the same document add no citations. This table covers all sources.
Audit the counts Source documents in the catalog
Source documents from every registry. Expand a document to inspect the benchmarks it records and open the original evidence.
Big picture
What we found
See what shows up most often and where it came from. Open the connections view when you want to look at a specific item.
Want more detail? See how everything connects
There are a lot of dots here. Pick one to see what it connects to, or open the matching results.
Saturation
Scores over time
Benchmark reported scores over time
How to read this chart
Every value that could be read verbatim from a cited document, placed at the date that document was published rather than at any evaluation date. The line directly links actual observations that set a new reported record among the values shown; it neither holds a score between reports nor extends past the final record. Test versions and run conditions can differ, so this is a reported-record path, not a like-for-like trend. When no newer number could be read, the gap is marked rather than drawn through. Whether a benchmark has saturated stays a reading you make, not a score this panel prints.
Trend
New by domain
Daily evidence and attention volume
Category tags overlap. Each bar is an independent count, not a part of a stacked total.
Releases only excludes records re-announced as an update to something already surfaced.
Dev checker
Source mix counts ranked evidence after scoring. Fetch health counts raw records returned before scoring, so a source can be ok and still empty.
| Date | Coverage (UTC) | Evidence | Source mix | Categories | Events | Attention | Fetch health |
|---|
Dashboard unavailable
The validated data file could not be loaded.
Try refreshing, or inspect the latest daily Issue while the dashboard rebuilds.
Open daily Issues ↗